Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1526

reference
981-tree-1
name
1526
tree-preservation-order

undefined

981-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.002805 50.854510)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.002762 50.854505,-1.002764 50.854513,-1.002770 50.854521,-1.002779 50.854527,-1.002791 50.854531,-1.002804 50.854532,-1.002817 50.854531,-1.002839 50.854522,-1.002845 50.854514,-1.002847 50.854506,-1.002846 50.854497,-1.002840 50.854490,-1.002830 50.854484,-1.002819 50.854480,-1.002805 50.854478,-1.002780 50.854483,-1.002771 50.854489,-1.002765 50.854497,-1.002762 50.854505)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL